↓ Skip to main content

On the road to ‘research municipalities’: analysing transdisciplinarity in municipal ecosystem services and adaptation planning

Overview of attention for article published in Sustainability Science, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
On the road to ‘research municipalities’: analysing transdisciplinarity in municipal ecosystem services and adaptation planning
Published in
Sustainability Science, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11625-017-0499-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ebba Brink, Christine Wamsler, Maria Adolfsson, Monica Axelsson, Thomas Beery, Helena Björn, Torleif Bramryd, Nils Ekelund, Therese Jephson, Widar Narvelo, Barry Ness, K. Ingemar Jönsson, Thomas Palo, Magnus Sjeldrup, Sanna Stålhammar, Geraldine Thiere

Abstract

Transdisciplinary research and collaboration is widely acknowledged as a critical success factor for solution-oriented approaches that can tackle complex sustainability challenges, such as biodiversity loss, pollution, and climate-related hazards. In this context, city governments' engagement in transdisciplinarity is generally seen as a key condition for societal transformation towards sustainability. However, empirical evidence is rare. This paper presents a self-assessment of a joint research project on ecosystem services and climate adaptation planning (ECOSIMP) undertaken by four universities and seven Swedish municipalities. We apply a set of design principles and guiding questions for transdisciplinary sustainability projects and, on this basis, identify key aspects for supporting university-municipality collaboration. We show that: (1) selecting the number and type of project stakeholders requires more explicit consideration of the purpose of societal actors' participation; (2) concrete, interim benefits for participating practitioners and organisations need to be continuously discussed; (3) promoting the 'inter', i.e., interdisciplinary and inter-city learning, can support transdisciplinarity and, ultimately, urban sustainability and long-term change. In this context, we found that design principles for transdisciplinarity have the potential to (4) mitigate project shortcomings, even when transdisciplinarity is not an explicit aim, and (5) address differences and allow new voices to be heard. We propose additional guiding questions to address shortcomings and inspire reflexivity in transdisciplinary projects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 166 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 17%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Student > Bachelor 7 4%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 50 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 33 20%
Social Sciences 28 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 3%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 57 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,541,834
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Sustainability Science
#537
of 801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,953
of 294,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sustainability Science
#18
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.