| Title |
Biomass soaking treatments to reduce potentially undesirable compounds in the edible seaweeds sugar kelp (Saccharina latissima) and winged kelp (Alaria esculenta) and health risk estimation for human consumption
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Phycology, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10811-017-1343-8 |
| Authors |
Pierrick Stévant, Hélène Marfaing, Arne Duinker, Joël Fleurence, Turid Rustad, Ingrid Sandbakken, Annelise Chapman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 43 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 48 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,707,561
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#202
of 2,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,724
of 438,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#4
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,567 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.