↓ Skip to main content

Testing the Mediating Effects of Obsessive Beliefs in Internet‐Based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Obsessive‐Compulsive Disorder: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Testing the Mediating Effects of Obsessive Beliefs in Internet‐Based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Obsessive‐Compulsive Disorder: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/cpp.1931
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erik Andersson, Brjánn Ljótsson, Erik Hedman, Hugo Hesser, Jesper Enander, Viktor Kaldo, Gerhard Andersson, Nils Lindefors, Christian Rück

Abstract

Although cognitive interventions for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have been tested in randomized trials, there are few trials that have tested the specific mechanisms of cognitive interventions, i.e. how they achieve their effects. In this study, we aimed to investigate the mediating effects of a short cognitive intervention in the treatment of OCD and used data from a recently conducted randomized controlled trial where 101 participants were allocated to either Internet-based CBT (ICBT) or to a control condition. Obsessive beliefs were measured at pre-treatment, at the time they had received the cognitive intervention, and also at post-treatment. Weekly OCD symptoms were measured throughout the 10 weeks of treatment. We hypothesized that (1) the ICBT group would have greater reductions in obsessive beliefs (controlling for change in OCD symptoms) after completing the cognitive intervention, and that (2) this reduction would, in turn, predict greater OCD symptom reduction throughout the rest of the treatment period. Contrary to our expectations, the longitudinal mediation analysis indicated that (1) being randomized to ICBT actually increased the degree of obsessive beliefs after receiving the cognitive intervention at weeks 1-3, and (2) increase in obsessive beliefs predicted better outcome later in treatment. However, when repeating the analysis using cross-sectional data at post-treatment, the results were in line with the initial hypotheses. Results were replicated when the control condition received ICBT. We conclude that, although obsessive beliefs were significantly reduced at post-treatment for the ICBT group, early increase rather than decrease in obsessive beliefs predicted favourable outcome. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 129 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 14%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 25 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 68 51%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 32 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2015.
All research outputs
#16,711,078
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
#651
of 865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,358
of 372,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.