↓ Skip to main content

How do people value extended warranties? Evidence from two field surveys

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
How do people value extended warranties? Evidence from two field surveys
Published in
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11166-010-9094-9
Authors

Marieke Huysentruyt, Daniel Read

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 62 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Student > Master 9 14%
Researcher 8 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 23 35%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15 23%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,033,437
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
#127
of 406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,924
of 97,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them