↓ Skip to main content

Review of organizational effects on the outcome of mental health treatments

Overview of attention for article published in Psychotherapy Research, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Review of organizational effects on the outcome of mental health treatments
Published in
Psychotherapy Research, March 2016
DOI 10.1080/10503307.2016.1158883
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fredrik Falkenström, Johan Grant, Rolf Holmqvist

Abstract

As there are theoretical, clinical, and "common sense" reasons to expect a relationship between organizational factors and outcome in clinics providing psychotherapy and other mental health treatments, a review of empirical research in this area was undertaken with the aim of finding empirical evidence for organizational effects. A structured search for studies on organizational differences in patient mental health outcomes was performed using EBSCO host, Cochrane Library Database, and the Health Systems Evidence database at McMasters University. Finished studies published in English were included if they presented data from more than one mental health service and used change in symptom, level of functioning, or quality of life as outcome. The search yielded not more than 19 studies fulfilling inclusion criteria. All studies showed some evidence for organization effects, and there was some evidence for organizational climate and culture explaining differences in outcome. Given that mental health treatments are likely to be especially susceptive to organizational effects, it is remarkable that not more research has been devoted to this. Clearly, more research is needed to study the consequences of work organization for the outcome of psychotherapy. Methodological issues in organizational studies are discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 17%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 32%