| Title |
Lionfish in the eastern Pacific: a cellular automaton approach to assessing invasion risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-014-0696-z |
| Authors |
Matthew W. Johnston, Sam J. Purkis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 26% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2015.
All research outputs
#2,872,082
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#447
of 2,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,239
of 227,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#5
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.