↓ Skip to main content

Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay Compared With Standard Clinicopathologic Guidelines in Adjuvant Therapy Selection for Node-Negative, Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay Compared With Standard Clinicopathologic Guidelines in Adjuvant Therapy Selection for Node-Negative, Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, May 2011
DOI 10.1245/s10434-011-1698-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica F. Partin, Eleftherios P. Mamounas

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 45 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 20%
Other 7 14%
Professor 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 57%
Computer Science 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2017.
All research outputs
#4,221,772
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,299
of 6,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,134
of 110,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#7
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.