| Title |
Plant responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Plant Pathology, June 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10658-007-9165-1 |
| Authors |
L. C. van Loon |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 741 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 10 | 1% |
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 2% |
| Unknown | 701 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 155 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 137 | 18% |
| Researcher | 93 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 79 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 35 | 5% |
| Other | 101 | 14% |
| Unknown | 141 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 421 | 57% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 73 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 35 | 5% |
| Engineering | 12 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 34 | 5% |
| Unknown | 160 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,518,497
of 23,515,383 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#17
of 964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,512
of 71,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 964 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.