↓ Skip to main content

The Acoustic Habitat Hypothesis: An Ecoacoustics Perspective on Species Habitat Selection

Overview of attention for article published in Biosemiotics, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 211)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
Title
The Acoustic Habitat Hypothesis: An Ecoacoustics Perspective on Species Habitat Selection
Published in
Biosemiotics, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12304-017-9288-5
Authors

Timothy C. Mullet, Almo Farina, Stuart H. Gage

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 186 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 17%
Student > Master 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 27 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 38%
Environmental Science 48 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 3%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 38 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,302,991
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Biosemiotics
#39
of 211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,674
of 309,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biosemiotics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 211 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.