| Title |
A reversed Ebbinghaus–Titchener illusion in bantams (Gallus gallus domesticus)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Cognition, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10071-013-0679-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Noriyuki Nakamura, Sota Watanabe, Kazuo Fujita |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 17% |
| Researcher | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 10 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 23% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2017.
All research outputs
#1,025,919
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#247
of 1,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,570
of 200,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.