↓ Skip to main content

The Association Between Artificial Sweeteners and Obesity

Overview of attention for article published in Current Gastroenterology Reports, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 601)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
58 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
228 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
8 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
449 Mendeley
Title
The Association Between Artificial Sweeteners and Obesity
Published in
Current Gastroenterology Reports, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11894-017-0602-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Pearlman, Jon Obert, Lisa Casey

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to review the epidemiology of obesity and the evolution of artificial sweeteners; to examine the latest research on the effects of artificial sweeteners on the host microbiome, the gut-brain axis, glucose homeostasis, and energy consumption; and to discuss how all of these changes ultimately contribute to obesity. Although artificial sweeteners were developed as a sugar substitute to help reduce insulin resistance and obesity, data in both animal models and humans suggest that the effects of artificial sweeteners may contribute to metabolic syndrome and the obesity epidemic. Artificial sweeteners appear to change the host microbiome, lead to decreased satiety, and alter glucose homeostasis, and are associated with increased caloric consumption and weight gain. Artificial sweeteners are marketed as a healthy alternative to sugar and as a tool for weight loss. Data however suggests that the intended effects do not correlate with what is seen in clinical practice. Future research should focus on the newer plant-based sweeteners, incorporate extended study durations to determine the long-term effects of artificial sweetener consumption, and focus on changes in the microbiome, as that seems to be one of the main driving forces behind nutrient absorption and glucose metabolism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 228 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 449 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 449 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 79 18%
Student > Master 70 16%
Researcher 27 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 6%
Student > Postgraduate 19 4%
Other 56 12%
Unknown 171 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 69 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 51 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 2%
Other 53 12%
Unknown 188 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 653. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2024.
All research outputs
#33,705
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Current Gastroenterology Reports
#2
of 601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#682
of 448,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Gastroenterology Reports
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 601 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.