↓ Skip to main content

Early Detection of Emerging Zoonotic Diseases with Animal Morbidity and Mortality Monitoring

Overview of attention for article published in EcoHealth, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Early Detection of Emerging Zoonotic Diseases with Animal Morbidity and Mortality Monitoring
Published in
EcoHealth, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10393-014-0988-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isabelle-Anne Bisson, Benard J. Ssebide, Peter P. Marra

Abstract

Diseases transmitted between animals and people have made up more than 50% of emerging infectious diseases in humans over the last 60 years and have continued to arise in recent months. Yet, public health and animal disease surveillance programs continue to operate independently. Here, we assessed whether recent emerging zoonotic pathogens (n = 143) are known to cause morbidity or mortality in their animal host and if so, whether they were first detected with an animal morbidity/mortality event. We show that although sick or dead animals are often associated with these pathogens (52%), only 9% were first detected from an animal morbidity or mortality event prior to or concurrent with signs of illness in humans. We propose that an animal morbidity and mortality reporting program will improve detection and should be an essential component of early warning systems for zoonotic diseases. With the use of widespread low-cost technology, such a program could engage both the public and professionals and be easily tested and further incorporated as part of surveillance efforts by public health officials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 2%
United States 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 95 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 11%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 31%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Environmental Science 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 28 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,169,080
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#70
of 706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,625
of 260,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.