You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995–2009: analysis of individual data for 25 676 887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)62038-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claudia Allemani, Hannah K Weir, Helena Carreira, Rhea Harewood, Devon Spika, Xiao-Si Wang, Finian Bannon, Jane V Ahn, Christopher J Johnson, Audrey Bonaventure, Rafael Marcos-Gragera, Charles Stiller, Gulnar Azevedo e Silva, Wan-Qing Chen, Olufemi J Ogunbiyi, Bernard Rachet, Matthew J Soeberg, Hui You, Tomohiro Matsuda, Magdalena Bielska-Lasota, Hans Storm, Thomas C Tucker, Michel P Coleman, the CONCORD Working Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 523 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 76 | 15% |
| United States | 64 | 12% |
| Spain | 37 | 7% |
| Canada | 34 | 7% |
| Australia | 9 | 2% |
| Ireland | 8 | 2% |
| Norway | 8 | 2% |
| France | 7 | 1% |
| Colombia | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 85 | 16% |
| Unknown | 189 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 354 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 85 | 16% |
| Scientists | 63 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 20 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,814 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 6 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| China | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1783 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 260 | 14% |
| Researcher | 252 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 209 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 178 | 10% |
| Other | 123 | 7% |
| Other | 366 | 20% |
| Unknown | 426 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 656 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 133 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 104 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 96 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 45 | 2% |
| Other | 269 | 15% |
| Unknown | 511 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 809. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#23,513
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#584
of 43,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145
of 376,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#2
of 545 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 545 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.