Title |
Best practice in major elective rectal/pelvic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Updates in Surgery, October 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13304-017-0492-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Josefin Segelman, Jonas Nygren |
Abstract |
Within traditional clinical care, the postoperative recovery after pelvic/rectal surgery has been slow with high morbidity and long hospital stay. The enhanced recovery after surgery program is a multimodal approach to perioperative care designed to accelerate recovery and safely reduce hospital stay. This review will briefly summarize optimal perioperative care, before, during and after surgery in this group of patients and issues related to implementation and audit. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 23% |
Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
Researcher | 3 | 10% |
Other | 5 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 47% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 20% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2017.
All research outputs
#18,576,855
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Updates in Surgery
#458
of 642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,957
of 327,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Updates in Surgery
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 642 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.