↓ Skip to main content

Mental fatigue does not affect maximal anaerobic exercise performance

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
50 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
Title
Mental fatigue does not affect maximal anaerobic exercise performance
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00421-014-3052-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristy Martin, Kevin G. Thompson, Richard Keegan, Nick Ball, Ben Rattray

Abstract

Mental fatigue can negatively impact on submaximal endurance exercise and has been attributed to changes in perceived exertion rather than changes in physiological variables. The impact of mental fatigue on maximal anaerobic performance is, however, unclear. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to induce a state of mental fatigue to examine the effects on performance, physiological and perceptual variables from subsequent tests of power, strength and anaerobic capacity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 233 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 20%
Student > Bachelor 34 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 10%
Researcher 21 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 4%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 65 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 88 37%
Psychology 16 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 5%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 76 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,157,675
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#354
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,936
of 369,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#6
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.