↓ Skip to main content

An integrated transcriptome and expressed variant analysis of sepsis survival and death

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
patent
7 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An integrated transcriptome and expressed variant analysis of sepsis survival and death
Published in
Genome Medicine, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13073-014-0111-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ephraim L Tsalik, Raymond J Langley, Darrell L Dinwiddie, Neil A Miller, Byunggil Yoo, Jennifer C van Velkinburgh, Laurie D Smith, Isabella Thiffault, Anja K Jaehne, Ashlee M Valente, Ricardo Henao, Xin Yuan, Seth W Glickman, Brandon J Rice, Micah T McClain, Lawrence Carin, G Ralph Corey, Geoffrey S Ginsburg, Charles B Cairns, Ronny M Otero, Vance G Fowler, Emanuel P Rivers, Christopher W Woods, Stephen F Kingsmore

Abstract

Sepsis, a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, is not a homogeneous disease but rather a syndrome encompassing many heterogeneous pathophysiologies. Patient factors including genetics predispose to poor outcomes, though current clinical characterizations fail to identify those at greatest risk of progression and mortality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Unknown 126 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 32%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 26 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,100,025
of 24,293,076 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#457
of 1,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,425
of 371,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#19
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,293,076 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.