| Title |
Re-evaluation of the yield response to phosphorus fertilization based on meta-analyses of long-term field experiments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-017-0971-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Uwe Buczko, Michael van Laak, Bettina Eichler-Löbermann, Wolfgang Gans, Ines Merbach, Kerstin Panten, Edgar Peiter, Thomas Reitz, Heide Spiegel, Sabine von Tucher |
| Abstract |
Phosphorus (P) fertilizer recommendations in most European countries are based on plant-available soil P contents and long-term field experiments. Site-specific conditions are often neglected, resulting in excessive P fertilizer applications. P fertilization experiments including relevant site and soil parameters were evaluated in order to analyze the yield response. The database comprises about 2000 datasets from 30 field experiments from Germany and Austria. Statistical evaluations using a classification and regression tree approach, and multiple linear regression analysis indicate that besides plant-available soil P content, soil texture and soil organic matter content have a large influence on the effectiveness of P fertilization. This study methodology can be a basis for modification and specification of existing P fertilization recommendations and thus contribute to mitigate environmental impacts of P fertilization. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2018.
All research outputs
#17,920,654
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#1,516
of 1,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,402
of 437,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#28
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.