↓ Skip to main content

Oropharyngeal Dysphagia and Cerebral Palsy

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatrics, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oropharyngeal Dysphagia and Cerebral Palsy
Published in
Pediatrics, December 2017
DOI 10.1542/peds.2017-0731
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine A. Benfer, Kelly A. Weir, Kristie L. Bell, Robert S. Ware, Peter S.W. Davies, Roslyn N. Boyd

Abstract

To determine the progression of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD) in preschool-aged children with cerebral palsy (CP) according to gross motor function. It was hypothesized that fewer children would have OPD at 60 months compared with 18 to 24 months (predominately Gross Motor Function Classification System [GMFCS] I-II). Longitudinal population-based cohort of 179 children (confirmed CP diagnosis, born in Queensland in 2006-2009, aged 18-60 months at study entry [mean = 34.1 months ± 11.9; 111 boys; GMFCS I = 46.6%, II = 12.9%, III = 15.7%, IV = 10.1%, and V = 14.6%]). Children had a maximum of 3 assessments (median = 3, total n = 423 assessments). OPD was classified by using the Dysphagia Disorders Survey part 2 and rated from video by a certified pediatric speech pathologist. GMFCS was used to classify children's gross motor function. OPD prevalence reduced from 79.7% at 18 to 24 months to 43.5% at 60 months. There were decreasing odds of OPD with increasing age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90 to 0.95]; P < .001) and increasing odds with poorer gross motor function (OR = 6.2 [95% CI 3.6 to 10.6]; P < .001). This reduction was significant for children with ambulatory CP (GMFCS I-II, OR = 0.93 [95% CI 0.90 to 0.96]; P < .001) but not significant for children from GMFCS III to V (OR [III] = 1.0 [95% CI 0.9 to 1.1]; P = .897; OR [IV-V] = 1.0 [95% CI 1.0 to 1.1]; P = .366). Half of the OPD present in children with CP between 18 and 24 months resolved by 60 months, with improvement most common in GMFCS I to II. To more accurately detect and target intervention at children with persisting OPD at 60 months, we suggest using a more conservative cut point of 6 out of 22 on the Dysphagia Disorders Survey for assessments between 18 and 48 months.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 152 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Other 9 6%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 62 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 19%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 67 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2017.
All research outputs
#13,236,261
of 23,330,477 outputs
Outputs from Pediatrics
#12,790
of 16,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,951
of 439,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatrics
#181
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,330,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.