You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Navigating the fine line between benefit and risk in chronic atrial fibrillation: Rationale and design of the Standard versus Atrial Fibrillation spEcific managemenT studY (SAFETY)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Cardiology, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.10.065 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melinda J. Carrington, Jocasta Ball, John D. Horowitz, Thomas H. Marwick, Gnanadevan Mahadevan, Chiew Wong, Walter P. Abhayaratna, Brian Haluska, David R. Thompson, Paul A. Scuffham, Simon Stewart |
| Abstract |
Health outcomes associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) continue to be poor and standard management often does not provide clinical stability. The Standard versus Atrial Fibrillation spEcific managemenT studY (SAFETY) compares the efficacy of a post-discharge, nurse-led, multi-disciplinary programme to optimise AF management with usual care. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2014.
All research outputs
#4,835,465
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Cardiology
#1,081
of 7,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,906
of 153,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Cardiology
#10
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.