↓ Skip to main content

Processing fluency effects: Can the content and presentation of participant information sheets influence recruitment and participation for an antenatal intervention?

Overview of attention for article published in Patient Education & Counseling, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Processing fluency effects: Can the content and presentation of participant information sheets influence recruitment and participation for an antenatal intervention?
Published in
Patient Education & Counseling, November 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew J. Manley, Tina Lavender, Debbie M. Smith

Abstract

To assess the extent to which the title and font of participant information sheets (PISs) can influence pregnant women's and trainee midwives' perceptions of an antenatal intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Psychology 4 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 11 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2019.
All research outputs
#756,555
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Patient Education & Counseling
#64
of 4,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,293
of 369,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient Education & Counseling
#1
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.