↓ Skip to main content

Continuous monitoring of blood pressure by analyzing the blood flow sound of arteriovenous fistula in hemodialysis patients

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Continuous monitoring of blood pressure by analyzing the blood flow sound of arteriovenous fistula in hemodialysis patients
Published in
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10157-017-1499-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuka Kamijo, Eiichiro Kanda, Hayato Horiuchi, Noriyuki Kounoue, Keisuke Ono, Keizo Maeda, Akane Yanai, Kazuya Honda, Ryuji Tsujimoto, Mai Yanagi, Yoshitaka Ishibashi, Masayuki Yoshida

Abstract

Patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis (HD) have an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease-related morbidity and mortality. To prevent from such a life-threatening event, the continuous blood pressure (BP) monitoring system may contribute to detect BP decline in early stages and may help to do appropriate disposal. Our research team has introduced an electronic stethoscope (Asahi Kasei Co, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), which translates sound intensity of Arteriovenous Fistula (AVF) to BP data using the technique of Fourier transformation that can predict continuous BP non-invasively. This study, we investigated whether electronic stethoscope-guided estimated BP (e-BP) would actually reflect systolic BP measured by sphygmomanometer (s-BP), and whether e-BP could predict fall of BP during HD. Twenty-six patients who underwent HD treatment in our hospital were evaluated prospectively. We obtained sound intensity data from the electronic stethoscope which was equipped with the return line of HD. Then, the data were translated into e-BP data to be compared with s-BP. Correlation of total of 315 data sets obtained from each method was examined. An accuracy of diagnosis of intra-dialytic hypotension (IDH) was evaluated. Total of 315 data sets were obtained. A close correlation was observed between e-BP and s-BP (r = 0.887, p < 0.0001). Sensitivity and positive predictive value of predicted-BP for detection of IDH was 90 and 81.3%, respectively. Electronic stethoscope-guided BP measurement would be helpful for real-time diagnosis of BP fall in HD patients. Further investigations are needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 29%
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Other 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 25%
Engineering 4 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2017.
All research outputs
#16,069,695
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
#409
of 769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,515
of 330,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 769 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.