↓ Skip to main content

A biomechanical investigation of dual growing rods used for fusionless scoliosis correction

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Biomechanics, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A biomechanical investigation of dual growing rods used for fusionless scoliosis correction
Published in
Clinical Biomechanics, November 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.11.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

M.E. Quick, C.A. Grant, C.J. Adam, G.N. Askin, R.D. Labrom, M.J. Pearcy

Abstract

The use of dual growing rods is a fusionless surgical approach to the treatment of early onset scoliosis which aims to harness potential growth and correct spinal deformity. The purpose of this study was to compare the in-vitro biomechanical response of two different dual rod designs under axial rotation loading.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 27%
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 12 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 14 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2014.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Biomechanics
#1,403
of 2,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,048
of 369,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Biomechanics
#23
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.