| Title |
Design of an impact evaluation using a mixed methods model – an explanatory assessment of the effects of results-based financing mechanisms on maternal healthcare services in Malawi
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-180 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephan Brenner, Adamson S Muula, Paul Jacob Robyn, Till Bärnighausen, Malabika Sarker, Don P Mathanga, Thomas Bossert, Manuela De Allegri |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Senegal | 1 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| South Africa | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 250 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 63 | 25% |
| Researcher | 36 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 40 | 16% |
| Unknown | 56 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 32 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 43 | 17% |
| Unknown | 65 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,004,897
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,353
of 8,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,394
of 234,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#34
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,604 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.