| Title |
Elevated risk of stillbirth in males: systematic review and meta-analysis of more than 30 million births
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-014-0220-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Debapriya Mondal, Tamara S Galloway, Trevor C Bailey, Fiona Mathews |
| Abstract |
Stillbirth rates have changed little over the last decade, and a high proportion of cases are unexplained. This meta-analysis examined whether there are inequalities in stillbirth risks according to sex. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 26% |
| United States | 3 | 16% |
| Spain | 2 | 11% |
| Egypt | 1 | 5% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 23% |
| Unknown | 26 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 33 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2017.
All research outputs
#576,947
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#422
of 3,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,453
of 367,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#8
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.