↓ Skip to main content

Optimizing the Bioavailability of Subcutaneously Administered Biotherapeutics Through Mechanochemical Drivers

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Research, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
Optimizing the Bioavailability of Subcutaneously Administered Biotherapeutics Through Mechanochemical Drivers
Published in
Pharmaceutical Research, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11095-017-2229-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. S. Collins, L. C. Kourtis, N. R. Thyagarajapuram, R. Sirkar, S. Kapur, M. W. Harrison, D. J. Bryan, G. B. Jones, J. M. Wright

Abstract

The subcutaneous route offers myriad benefits for the administration of biotherapeutics in both acute and chronic diseases, including convenience, cost effectiveness and the potential for automation through closed-loop systems. Recent advances in parenteral administration devices and the use of additives which enhance drug dispersion have generated substantial additional interest in IV to SQ switching studies. Designing pre-clinical and clinical studies using SQ mediated delivery however requires deep understanding of complex inter-related physiologies and transport pathways governing the interstitial matrix, vascular system and lymphatic channels. This expert review will highlight key structural features which contribute to transport and biodistribution in the subcutaneous space and also assess the impact of drug formulations. Based on the rapidly growing interest in the SQ delivery route, a number of potential areas for future development are highlighted, which are likely to allow continued evolution and innovation in this important area.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 100 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 15%
Other 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 30 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 18%
Engineering 12 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Chemistry 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 33 33%