↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of isometric, isotonic concentric and isotonic eccentric exercises in the physiotherapy management of subacromial pain syndrome/rotator cuff tendinopathy: study protocol for a pilot…

Overview of attention for article published in Pilot and Feasibility Studies, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
377 Mendeley
Title
A comparison of isometric, isotonic concentric and isotonic eccentric exercises in the physiotherapy management of subacromial pain syndrome/rotator cuff tendinopathy: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
Published in
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40814-017-0190-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rita Kinsella, Sallie M. Cowan, Lyn Watson, Tania Pizzari

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 377 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 377 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 84 22%
Student > Master 47 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 6%
Other 19 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 4%
Other 48 13%
Unknown 141 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 104 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 59 16%
Sports and Recreations 45 12%
Engineering 3 <1%
Social Sciences 2 <1%
Other 11 3%
Unknown 153 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,458,672
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#391
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,403
of 338,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.