↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of efficacy of kinesiological taping and subacromial injection therapy in subacromial impingement syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of efficacy of kinesiological taping and subacromial injection therapy in subacromial impingement syndrome
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10067-014-2824-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Volkan Subaşı, Tuncay Çakır, Zuhal Arıca, Rahime Nur Sarıer, Meral Bilgilisoy Filiz, Şebnem Koldaş Doğan, Naciye Füsun Toraman

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of kinesiological taping and subacromial injection therapy in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS). Seventy patients diagnosed with SIS were randomly assigned to group 1 (n = 35, injection group) or group 2 (n = 35, kinesiological taping group). Betamethasone plus prilocaine was injected to subacromial space in the patients in group 1. In group 2, tape was applied three times for a period of five consecutive days with a 2-day recovery interval. A 3-month exercise program was prescribed for both groups including stretching and strengthening exercises. All patients were assessed at baseline and at 1 and 3 months post-intervention. Assessments were made by visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, range of motion (ROM) measurements, specific tests, and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Significant differences were detected in VAS and SPADI scores as well as ROM measurements in both groups when compared to baseline (p > 0.05). No significant differences were detected between the groups except for active flexion degree in favor of group 1 (p = 0.004). Both kinesiological taping and steroid injection in conjunction with an exercise program were found to be effective in the treatment of SIS. Kinesio taping may be an alternative treatment option in the rehabilitation of SIS especially when a non-invasive technique is needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 234 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 23%
Student > Bachelor 40 17%
Other 15 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 77 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 58 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 54 23%
Sports and Recreations 15 6%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Neuroscience 3 1%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 83 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,364,434
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#304
of 3,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,168
of 365,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#4
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.