| Title |
EvoDevo as a Motley Aggregation: Local Integration and Conflicting Views of Genes During the 1980s
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Theory, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13752-014-0197-4 |
| Authors |
Yoshinari Yoshida, Hisashi Nakao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 83% |
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 4 | 67% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2015.
All research outputs
#6,091,673
of 24,292,134 outputs
Outputs from Biological Theory
#134
of 318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,491
of 370,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Theory
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,292,134 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.