↓ Skip to main content

Do Role Models Matter? An Investigation of Role Modeling as an Antecedent of Perceived Ethical Leadership

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
216 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
475 Mendeley
Title
Do Role Models Matter? An Investigation of Role Modeling as an Antecedent of Perceived Ethical Leadership
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10551-013-1769-0
Authors

Michael E. Brown, Linda K. Treviño

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 475 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Unknown 467 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 16%
Student > Master 71 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 66 14%
Student > Bachelor 31 7%
Lecturer 27 6%
Other 82 17%
Unknown 124 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 157 33%
Social Sciences 57 12%
Psychology 46 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15 3%
Arts and Humanities 15 3%
Other 56 12%
Unknown 129 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2017.
All research outputs
#13,315,560
of 23,653,937 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#1,626
of 3,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,110
of 198,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#16
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,653,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,030 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.