↓ Skip to main content

Building Resilience After School for Early Adolescents in Urban Poverty: Open Trial of Leaders @ Play

Overview of attention for article published in Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Building Resilience After School for Early Adolescents in Urban Poverty: Open Trial of Leaders @ Play
Published in
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10488-014-0608-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stacy L. Frazier, Sonya Mathies Dinizulu, Dana Rusch, Maya M. Boustani, Tara G. Mehta, Kristin Reitz

Abstract

Leaders @ Play is a park after-school program for urban middle school youth designed to leverage recreational activities for social emotional learning. Mental health and park staff co-facilitated sports and games to teach and practice problem solving, emotion regulation, and effective communication. Additional practice occurred during multi-family groups and summer internships as junior camp counselors. We examined feasibility and promise via an open trial (n = 3 parks, 46 youth, 100 % African American, 100 % low-income, 59 % female, M = 13.09 years old). Improvements in social skills and reductions in problem behaviors lend support to after school programs as a space for mental health promotion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 254 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 12%
Researcher 25 10%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 77 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 65 25%
Social Sciences 37 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 6%
Sports and Recreations 14 5%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 93 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2021.
All research outputs
#13,345,950
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#398
of 670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,140
of 367,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.