↓ Skip to main content

Perspectives on Mealtime Management in Residential Aged Care: Insights From a Cross-Disciplinary Investigation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nutrition For the Elderly, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perspectives on Mealtime Management in Residential Aged Care: Insights From a Cross-Disciplinary Investigation
Published in
Journal of Nutrition For the Elderly, November 2014
DOI 10.1080/21551197.2014.963275
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle K. Bennett, Elizabeth Ward, Nerina Scarinci, Monique Waite

Abstract

Meeting the medical, nutritional, and psychosocial mealtime needs of aged care residents requires a holistic, multidisciplinary approach. To date the perspectives of this multidisciplinary team have not been adequately explored. The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of a range of service providers involved in mealtime management in residential aged care. In-depth semistructured interviews were conducted with 61 participants from five service disciplines. Four themes emerged: ( 1 ) mealtimes are highly valued; ( 2 ) service providers face common barriers to mealtime management; ( 3 ) communication among service providers is challenging; and ( 4 ) education in mealtime management is limited. Data indicated service providers acknowledge the importance of mealtimes but recognize numerous shortfalls in current care. The need for interdisciplinary training and increased communication and collaboration among providers was emphasized, including the need for clarification of provider roles. Limited consideration of mealtimes in policy and funding documents was identified as a primary barrier in further prioritizing mealtime management and advancing mealtime care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Psychology 4 7%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 17 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nutrition For the Elderly
#176
of 198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315,650
of 369,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nutrition For the Elderly
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.