| Title |
Musculoskeletal effects of 5 days of bed rest with and without locomotion replacement training
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-014-3045-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E. Mulder, G. Clément, D. Linnarsson, W. H. Paloski, F. P. Wuyts, J. Zange, P. Frings-Meuthen, B. Johannes, V. Shushakov, M. Grunewald, N. Maassen, J. Buehlmeier, J. Rittweger |
| Abstract |
The present study evaluated the effectiveness of a short and versatile daily exercise regime, named locomotion replacement training (LRT), to maintain muscle size, isometric strength, power, and endurance capacity of the leg muscles following 5 days of head-down tilt (HDT) bed rest. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 21 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 36 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,168,964
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2,874
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,054
of 369,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#38
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.