↓ Skip to main content

Inter-rater reliability of STOPPFrail [Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions in Frail adults with limited life expectancy] criteria amongst 12 physicians

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Inter-rater reliability of STOPPFrail [Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions in Frail adults with limited life expectancy] criteria amongst 12 physicians
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00228-017-2376-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda Hanora Lavan, Paul Gallagher, Denis O’Mahony

Abstract

STOPPFrail is an explicit tool, developed by Delphi consensus, to assist physicians with deprescribing medications in frail older adults with poor survival prognosis. This study aimed to determine the inter-rater reliability (IRR), amongst physicians, of STOPPFrail application. Twenty clinical cases were collated to represent frail older patients. Eighteen cases met STOPPFrail inclusion criteria. They had a mean age of 79.5 (SD6) years and a median of 7 (IQR6-8.25) comorbidities and were prescribed a median of 9 (IQR7.75-11.25) medications. Two of the STOPPFrail originators reached complete agreement (gold standard) in determining 91 of 165 medications (55.2%) as inappropriate. Twelve physicians (6 geriatricians, 3 general practitioners and 3 palliative care physicians) independently applied STOPPFrail criteria. IRR between physicians and gold standard (GS) assessment was determined using Cohen's kappa statistic. Eighteen of the 20 cases that met STOPPFrail inclusion criteria were correctly identified by 9 of 12 physicians (75%). The average time taken per clinical case was 2.7 (SD0.94) minutes. The kappa co-efficient between physicians and GS assessment ranged from 0.71 (substantial) to 0.86 (good), with a mean kappa value of 0.758 (SD0.059). The Fleiss kappa coefficients between GS assessment and geriatricians, GPs and palliative care physicians were 0.80 (SD0.6), 0.77 (SD0.9) and 0.75 (SD0.1), respectively. No significant difference was noted, between groups or between participants within groups, as determined by one-way ANOVA, (df (2, 9) = 0.712, p = 0.516). IRR of STOPPFrail criteria between physicians, practising in different specialties, is substantial, despite no prior knowledge of the criteria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 136 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 8 6%
Other 28 21%
Unknown 37 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 13%
Psychology 4 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 41 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2018.
All research outputs
#5,467,677
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#634
of 2,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,328
of 437,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#10
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.