↓ Skip to main content

Manufactured nanoparticles: their uptake and effects on fish—a mechanistic analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Ecotoxicology, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
374 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
348 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Manufactured nanoparticles: their uptake and effects on fish—a mechanistic analysis
Published in
Ecotoxicology, April 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10646-008-0205-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard D. Handy, Theodore B. Henry, Tessa M. Scown, Blair D. Johnston, Charles R. Tyler

Abstract

There is an emerging literature reporting toxic effects of manufactured nanomaterials (NMs) and nanoparticles (NPs) in fish, but the mechanistic basis of both exposure and effect are poorly understood. This paper critically evaluates some of the founding assumptions in fish toxicology, and likely mechanisms of absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) of NPs in fish compared to other chemicals. Then, using a case study approach, the paper compares these assumptions for two different NPs; TiO2 and C60 fullerenes. Adsorption of NPs onto the gill surface will involve similar processes in the gill microenvironment and mucus layer to other substances, but the uptake mechanisms for NPs by epithelial cells are more likely to occur via vesicular processes (e.g., endocytosis) than uptake on membrane transporters or by diffusion through the cell membranes. Target organs may include the gills, gut, liver and sometimes the brain. Information on metabolism and excretion of NPs in fish is limited; but hepatic excretion into the bile seems a more likely mechanism, rather than mainly by renal or branchial excretion. TiO2 and C60 share some common chemical properties that appear to be associated with some similar toxic effects, but there are also differences, that highlight the notion that chemical reactivity can inform toxic effect of NPs in a fundamentally similar way to other chemicals. In this paper we identify many knowledge gaps including the lack of field observations on fish and other wildlife species for exposure and effects of manufactured NMs. Systematic studies of the abiotic factors that influence bioavailability, and investigation of the cell biology that informs on the mechanisms of metabolism and excretion of NMs, will greatly advance our understanding of the potential for adverse effects. There are also opportunities to apply existing tools and techniques to fundamental studies of fish toxicology with NPs, such as perfused organs and fish cell culture systems.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 324 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 65 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 16%
Student > Master 52 15%
Student > Bachelor 30 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 7%
Other 63 18%
Unknown 59 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 91 26%
Environmental Science 73 21%
Chemistry 29 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 6%
Engineering 21 6%
Other 38 11%
Unknown 75 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2017.
All research outputs
#4,595,987
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology
#143
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,376
of 81,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.