↓ Skip to main content

Analyses of Nutrients and Body Mass Index as Risk Factor for Preeclampsia

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Analyses of Nutrients and Body Mass Index as Risk Factor for Preeclampsia
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13224-017-0982-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yusrawati, Nicko Pisceski Kusika Saputra, Nur Indrawati Lipoeto, Rizanda Machmud

Abstract

Little is known about the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Many factors are identified as risk factors for preeclampsia including nutrients and obesity. The aim of this study was to assess whether nutrients and body mass index (BMI) are risk factors for preeclampsia. This was a case-control study at the Department of Obstetric and Gynecology in Dr. M. Djamil Hospital, Padang, Indonesia. A total of 140 patients were enrolled in this study with 70 cases and 70 controls. All subjects completed an interview for their nutritional status and prepregnancy BMI after delivery. The nutritional status was assessed by Food Frequency Questionnaire and then analyzed by Nutrisurvey Program. The independent samples t test was used for nutritional status, and Chi-square test was used for BMI. For nutrients, logistic regression procedures were employed to calculate potential risk factors associated with preeclampsia. Prevalence of abnormal BMI was more common in the preeclampsia group compared with those without preeclampsia 19 (27.1%) versus 12 (17.1%) but not found as a significant risk factor in this study (p = 0.222). Deficiency of vitamin E (OR 1.76, 95% CI 10.2 ± 30.5), zinc (OR 99.4, 95% CI 1.37 ± 7219), fat (OR 59.1, 95% CI 3.14 ± 500), calcium (OR 109, 95% CI 0.29 ± 40,041), vitamin C (OR 19.5, 95% CI 2.52 ± 151) were associated with increased risk of preeclampsia. Excess of carbohydrate was associated with increased risk of preeclampsia (OR 52.9, 95% CI 0.801 ± 3495). Deficiency of vitamin E, zinc, fat, calcium, and vitamin C, and excess of calories and carbohydrate were associated with increased risk of preeclampsia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Master 7 10%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 3 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 33 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 6%
Computer Science 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 34 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2017.
All research outputs
#18,576,855
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India
#245
of 358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,413
of 309,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 358 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.