↓ Skip to main content

Geriatric Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: Going the Extra Mile

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Geriatric Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: Going the Extra Mile
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13224-017-0997-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seethalakshmi Krishnan

Abstract

To assess the quality of life in geriatric patients after reconstructive and obliterative vaginal surgery for advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Prospective observational study was conducted between January 2009 and December 2014 at the department of Urogynaecology, Government Kasturbha Gandhi Hospital. A total of 424 women (between the age group of 60 and 94 years) with advanced pelvic organ prolapse underwent vaginal hysterectomy along with vaginal apical suspension procedures which were McCalls culdoplasty (35.02%), sacrospinous ligament suspension (8.3%), high uterosacral ligament suspension (26.2%), iliococcygeus fixation (4.6%) for stage 3-4 POP. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy (3.2%) was done for stage 3-4 vaginal vault prolapse. Patients with medical comorbidities underwent Leeforts partial colpocleisis (8.1%) and total colpocleisis (2%) for stage 3 and 4 POP. Site-specific repair (12.5%) was done for stage 3/4 cystocele and rectocele. The main outcomes measured were subjective cure (no prolapse), subjective improvements in pelvic floor symptoms as per the pelvic floor impact questionnaire, and objective cure (no prolapse of vaginal segment on maximum straining). Mean age of the patient was 64.29 years. The major complication rates were less than 1%. 85% were examined at 3 and 12 months. The subjective cure rate at 12 months is 92% and the objective cure rate is 94.5%. The geriatric patients who underwent either reconstructive or obliterative procedures were relieved of their preoperative symptoms and their quality of life had greatly improved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 16%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 8 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2017.
All research outputs
#18,576,855
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India
#245
of 358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,399
of 312,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 358 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.