↓ Skip to main content

Recent trends in SELEX technique and its application to food safety monitoring

Overview of attention for article published in Microchimica Acta, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Recent trends in SELEX technique and its application to food safety monitoring
Published in
Microchimica Acta, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00604-013-1156-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jingjing Wu, Yingyue Zhu, Feng Xue, Zhanlong Mei, Li Yao, Xin Wang, Lei Zheng, Jian Liu, Guodong Liu, Chifang Peng, Wei Chen

Abstract

The method referred to as "systemic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment" (SELEX) was introduced in 1990 and ever since has become an important tool for the identification and screening of aptamers. Such nucleic acids can recognize and bind to their corresponding targets (analytes) with high selectivity and affinity, and aptamers therefore have become attractive alternatives to traditional antibodies not the least because they are much more stable. Meanwhile, they have found numerous applications in different fields including food quality and safety monitoring. This review first gives an introduction into the selection process and to the evolution of SELEX, then covers applications of aptamers in the surveillance of food safety (with subsections on absorptiometric, electrochemical, fluorescent and other methods), and then gives conclusions and perspectives. The SELEX method excels by its features of in vitro, high throughput and ease of operation. This review contains 86 references.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 111 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 23%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 38 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 19 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 44 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2014.
All research outputs
#13,342,067
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Microchimica Acta
#568
of 1,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,085
of 308,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microchimica Acta
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,385 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.