↓ Skip to main content

Successional changes in the chicken cecal microbiome during 42 days of growth are independent of organic acid feed additives

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Successional changes in the chicken cecal microbiome during 42 days of growth are independent of organic acid feed additives
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12917-014-0282-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian B Oakley, R Jeff Buhr, Casey W Ritz, Brian H Kiepper, Mark E Berrang, Bruce S Seal, Nelson A Cox

Abstract

BackgroundPoultry remains a major source of foodborne bacterial infections. A variety of additives with presumed anti-microbial and/or growth-promoting effects are commonly added to poultry feed during commercial grow-out, yet the effects of these additives on the gastrointestinal microbial community (the GI microbiome) as the bird matures remain largely unknown. Here we compared temporal changes in the cecal microbiome to the effects of formic acid, propionic acid, and medium-chain fatty acids (MCFA) added to feed and/or drinking water.ResultsCecal bacterial communities at day of hatch (n¿=¿5 birds), 7d (n¿=¿32), 21d (n¿=¿27), and 42d (n¿=¿36) post-hatch were surveyed using direct 454 sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons from each bird in combination with cultivation-based recovery of a Salmonella Typhimurium marker strain and quantitative-PCR targeting Clostridium perfringens. Treatment effects on specific pathogens were generally non-significant. S. Typhimurium introduced by oral gavage at day of hatch was recovered by cultivation from nearly all birds sampled across treatments at 7d and 21d, but by 42d, S. Typhimurium was only recovered from ca. 25% of birds, regardless of treatment. Sequencing data also revealed non-significant treatment effects on genera containing known pathogens and on the cecal microbiome as a whole. In contrast, temporal changes in the cecal microbiome were dramatic, highly significant, and consistent across treatments. At 7d, the cecal community was dominated by three genera (Flavonifractor, Pseudoflavonifractor, and a Lachnospiracea sequence type) that accounted for more than half of sequences. By 21d post-hatch, a single genus (Faecalibacterium) accounted for 23-55% of sequences, and the number of Clostridium 16S rRNA gene copies detected by quantitative-PCR reached a maximum.ConclusionsOver the 42 d experiment, the cecal bacterial community changed significantly as measured by a variety of ecological metrics and increases in the complexity of co-occurrence networks. Management of poultry to improve animal health, nutrition, or food safety may need to consider the interactive effects of any treatments with the dramatic temporal shifts in the taxonomic composition of the cecal microbiome as described here.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 158 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 21%
Researcher 29 18%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 35 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 43 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2015.
All research outputs
#18,385,510
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#1,918
of 3,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,069
of 361,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#56
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,045 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.