↓ Skip to main content

Integrating Landscape Carbon Cycling: Research Needs for Resolving Organic Carbon Budgets of Lakes

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
Title
Integrating Landscape Carbon Cycling: Research Needs for Resolving Organic Carbon Budgets of Lakes
Published in
Ecosystems, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10021-014-9826-9
Authors

Paul C. Hanson, Michael L. Pace, Stephen R. Carpenter, Jonathan J. Cole, Emily H. Stanley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Canada 3 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 232 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 22%
Student > Master 47 20%
Researcher 36 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Student > Bachelor 14 6%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 36 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 96 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 32 13%
Engineering 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 50 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2015.
All research outputs
#3,464,391
of 23,917,076 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#303
of 1,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,041
of 368,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,917,076 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.