| Title |
Opening science: towards an agenda of open science in academia and industry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Technology Transfer, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10961-014-9375-6 |
| Authors |
Sascha Friesike, Bastian Widenmayer, Oliver Gassmann, Thomas Schildhauer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 11% |
| United States | 5 | 11% |
| Germany | 4 | 9% |
| Colombia | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 11% |
| Scientists | 4 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 260 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 13% |
| Researcher | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 63 | 24% |
| Unknown | 60 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 46 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 43 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 26 | 10% |
| Engineering | 12 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 52 | 20% |
| Unknown | 77 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2022.
All research outputs
#859,965
of 25,410,626 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Technology Transfer
#7
of 624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,784
of 369,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Technology Transfer
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,410,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 624 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.