| Title |
Whole-genome screening indicates a possible burst of formation of processed pseudogenes and Alu repeats by particular L1 subfamilies in ancestral primates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, October 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2003-4-11-r74 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kazuhiko Ohshima, Masahira Hattori, Tetsusi Yada, Takashi Gojobori, Yoshiyuki Sakaki, Norihiro Okada |
| Abstract |
Abundant pseudogenes are a feature of mammalian genomes. Processed pseudogenes (PPs) are reverse transcribed from mRNAs. Recent molecular biological studies show that mammalian long interspersed element 1 (L1)-encoded proteins may have been involved in PP reverse transcription. Here, we present the first comprehensive analysis of human PPs using all known human genes as queries. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 103 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 26% |
| Researcher | 30 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 10 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#4,055
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,098
of 56,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#16
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.