↓ Skip to main content

The Functional Anatomy of Impulse Control Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
The Functional Anatomy of Impulse Control Disorders
Published in
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11910-013-0386-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catharina C. Probst, Thilo van Eimeren

Abstract

Impulsive-compulsive disorders such as pathological gambling, hypersexuality, compulsive eating, and shopping are side effects of the dopaminergic therapy for Parkinson's disease. With a lower prevalence, these disorders also appear in the general population. Research in the last few years has discovered that these pathological behaviors share features similar to those of substance use disorders (SUD), which has led to the term "behavioral addictions". As in SUDs, the behaviors are marked by a compulsive drive toward and impaired control over the behavior. Furthermore, animal and medication studies, research in the Parkinson's disease population, and neuroimaging findings indicate a common neurobiology of addictive behaviors. Changes associated with addictions are mainly seen in the dopaminergic system of a mesocorticolimbic circuit, the so-called reward system. Here we outline neurobiological findings regarding behavioral addictions with a focus on dopaminergic systems, relate them to SUD theories, and try to build a tentative concept integrating genetics, neuroimaging, and behavioral results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 20 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 19%
Neuroscience 11 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 24 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#6,462,843
of 23,770,218 outputs
Outputs from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#345
of 947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,836
of 200,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,770,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.