You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inheritance of Acquired Behaviour Adaptations and Brain Gene Expression in Chickens
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0006405 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Nätt, Niclas Lindqvist, Henrik Stranneheim, Joakim Lundeberg, Peter A. Torjesen, Per Jensen |
| Abstract |
Environmental challenges may affect both the exposed individuals and their offspring. We investigated possible adaptive aspects of such cross-generation transmissions, and hypothesized that chronic unpredictable food access would cause chickens to show a more conservative feeding strategy and to be more dominant, and that these adaptations would be transmitted to the offspring. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Sweden | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 27% |
| Researcher | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 67 | 60% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,987,703
of 23,866,543 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#72,587
of 203,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,234
of 113,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#164
of 502 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,866,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 502 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.