↓ Skip to main content

Cannabinoid receptors and their role in neuroprotection

Overview of attention for article published in NeuroMolecular Medicine, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Cannabinoid receptors and their role in neuroprotection
Published in
NeuroMolecular Medicine, January 2005
DOI 10.1385/nmm:7:1-2:037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mario van der Stelt, Vincenzo Di Marzo

Abstract

Two G protein-coupled receptors for marijuana's psychoactive component, Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol, have been cloned to date, the cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors. These two proteins, the endogenous lipids that activate them, also known as endocannabinoids, and the proteins for the biosynthesis and inactivation of these ligands constitute the endocannabinoid system. Evidence has accumulated over the last few years suggesting that endocannabinoid-based drugs may potentially be useful to reduce the effects of neurodegeneration. In fact, exogenous and endogenous cannabinoids were shown to exert neuroprotection in a variety of in vitro and in vivo models of neuronal injury via different mechanisms, such as prevention of excitotoxicity by cannabinoid CB1-mediated inhibition of glutamatergic transmission, reduction of calcium influx, anti-oxidant activity, activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B pathway, induction of phosphorylation of extracellular regulated kinases and the expression of transcription factors and neurotrophins, lowering of cerebrovasoconstriction and induction of hypothermia. The release of endocannabinoids during neuronal injury may constitute a protective response. If this neuroprotective function of cannabinoid receptor activation can be transferred to the clinic, it might represent an interesting target to develop neuroprotective agents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 84 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 27%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Master 9 10%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 17 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 17%
Chemistry 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 18 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from NeuroMolecular Medicine
#174
of 478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,588
of 151,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroMolecular Medicine
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.