| Title |
Refractive Status and Amblyopia Risk Factors in Chinese Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-017-3387-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiaxing Wang, Gang Ding, Ying Li, Ning Hua, Nan Wei, Xiaoli Qi, Yuxian Ning, Ying Zhang, Xue Li, Jing Li, Linlin Song, Xuehan Qian |
| Abstract |
Amblyopia risk factors in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are usually hard to detect in early childhood due to poor cooperation and has not been reported in the Chinese population. We screened 168 Chinese children with ASD, aged between 3 and 8 years, and 264 age-matched neurotypical children with Spot photoscreener and basic ophthalmologic examinations. Children with ASD were found to have normal refractive status but significantly higher incidence of strabismus (16.1%), compared with control children (1.5%) (p < 0.01). Most of the cases of strabismus found in children with ASD were classified as esodeviation. Strabismus in children with ASD should be considered more seriously as an amblyopia risk factor by ophthalmologists and other healthcare professionals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 3 | 13% |
| Spain | 2 | 9% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 91% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Librarian | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
| Psychology | 5 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,466,988
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,055
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,399
of 447,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#33
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.