↓ Skip to main content

Development of ICF Core Sets to standardize assessment of functioning and impairment in ADHD: the path ahead

Overview of attention for article published in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
Title
Development of ICF Core Sets to standardize assessment of functioning and impairment in ADHD: the path ahead
Published in
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00787-013-0496-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sven Bölte, Elles de Schipper, Martin Holtmann, Sunil Karande, Petrus J. de Vries, Melissa Selb, Rosemary Tannock

Abstract

In the study of health and quality of life in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), it is of paramount importance to include assessment of functioning. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) provides a comprehensive, universally accepted framework for the description of functioning in relation to health conditions. In this paper, the authors outline the process to develop ICF Core Sets for ADHD. ICF Core Sets are subgroups of ICF categories selected to capture the aspects of functioning that are most likely to be affected in specific disorders. The ICF categories that will be included in the ICF Core Sets for ADHD will be determined at an ICF Core Set Consensus Conference, wherein evidence from four preliminary studies (a systematic review, an expert survey, a patient and caregiver qualitative study, and a clinical cross-sectional study) will be integrated. Comprehensive and Brief ICF Core Sets for ADHD will be developed with the goal of providing useful standards for research and clinical practice, and to generate a common language for the description of functioning in ADHD in different areas of life and across the lifespan.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 165 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 55 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 15%
Psychology 20 12%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 60 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,457,699
of 23,419,482 outputs
Outputs from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#279
of 1,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,555
of 311,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,419,482 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.