↓ Skip to main content

Association of Autism Spectrum Disorders and Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
83 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Association of Autism Spectrum Disorders and Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10803-017-3409-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maunoo Lee, Jayasree Krishnamurthy, Apryl Susi, Carolyn Sullivan, Gregory H. Gorman, Elizabeth Hisle-Gorman, Christine R. Erdie-Lalena, Cade M. Nylund

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) both have multifactorial pathogenesis with an increasing number of studies demonstrating gut-brain associations. We aim to examine the association between ASD and IBD using strict classification criteria for IBD. We conducted a retrospective case-cohort study using records from the Military Health System database with IBD defined as having one encounter with an ICD-9-CM diagnostic code for IBD and at least one outpatient prescription dispensed for a medication to treat IBD. Children with ASD were more likely to meet criteria for Crohn's disease (CD) and Ulcerative colitis (UC) compared to controls. This higher prevalence of CD and UC in children with ASD compared to controls confirms the association of ASD with IBD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Master 14 12%
Researcher 10 9%
Other 10 9%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 31 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 17%
Psychology 13 11%
Neuroscience 12 10%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 36 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2022.
All research outputs
#708,653
of 25,874,560 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#212
of 5,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,684
of 449,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#6
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,874,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.