| Title |
Crowdsourcing: a new tool for policy-making?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Policy Sciences, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11077-017-9303-3 |
| Authors |
Araz Taeihagh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 15% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Singapore | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Scientists | 4 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 20% |
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 38 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 35 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 17 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 17 | 12% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 41 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,369,185
of 24,002,307 outputs
Outputs from Policy Sciences
#87
of 457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,199
of 335,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Policy Sciences
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,002,307 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.