| Title |
A systematic review and meta-analysis of social cognitive theory-based physical activity and/or nutrition behavior change interventions for cancer survivors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11764-014-0413-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona G. Stacey, Erica L. James, Kathy Chapman, Kerry S. Courneya, David R. Lubans |
| Abstract |
Little is known about how to improve and create sustainable lifestyle behaviors of cancer survivors. Interventions based on social cognitive theory (SCT) have shown promise. This review examined the effect of SCT-based physical activity and nutrition interventions that target cancer survivors and identified factors associated with their efficacy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 44% |
| Canada | 2 | 22% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 561 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 552 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 105 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 85 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 10% |
| Researcher | 44 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 44 | 8% |
| Other | 87 | 16% |
| Unknown | 141 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 87 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 14% |
| Psychology | 69 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 44 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 42 | 7% |
| Other | 77 | 14% |
| Unknown | 162 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2017.
All research outputs
#5,494,616
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#386
of 967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,086
of 361,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.