↓ Skip to main content

Discussion point: reporting guidelines for mass spectrometry imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
Discussion point: reporting guidelines for mass spectrometry imaging
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00216-014-8322-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liam A. McDonnell, Andreas Römpp, Benjamin Balluff, Ron M. A. Heeren, Juan Pablo Albar, Per E. Andrén, Garry L. Corthals, Axel Walch, Markus Stoeckli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 98 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 28%
Researcher 18 18%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 6 6%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 32 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Computer Science 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 17 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2015.
All research outputs
#8,186,312
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#1,955
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,975
of 369,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#29
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.